DRAFT REGISTRATION REPORT Part B Section 9 Ecotoxicology Detailed summary of the risk assessment
Product code: xxx Product name(s): xxx Chemical active substance(s): Active substance 1, xxx g/L or g/kg Active substance 2, xxx g/L or g/kg Active substance 3, xxx g/L or g/kg Active substance 4, xxx g/L or g/kg
Central Zone/Interzonal Zonal Rapporteur Member State: zRMS
NATIONAL ADDENDUM for AUSTRIA (authorization/extension of use/…)
Applicant: company name Submission date: dd/mm/yyyy

Table of Contents

Ecotoxicological studies (IIIA 10)	2

9.2.	Effects on birds (KCP 10.1.1)	2

9.3.	Effects on terrestrial vertebrates other than birds (KCP 10.1.2)	2

9.4.	Effects on other terrestrial vertebrate wildlife (reptiles and amphibians) (KCP 10.1.3)	2

9.5.	Effects on aquatic organisms (KCP 10.2)	2

9.6.	Effects on bees (KCP 10.3.1)	2

9.7.	Effects on arthropods other than bees (KCP 10.3.2)	2

9.8.	Effects on non-target soil meso- and macrofauna (KCP 10.4)	2

9.9.	Effects on soil microbial activity (KCP 10.5)	2

9.10.	Effects on non-target terrestrial plants (KCP 10.6)	3

9.11.	Classification and Labelling	3

Appendix 1	Lists of data considered in support of the evaluation	4

Appendix 2	GAP’s applied for in AT	5

Ecotoxicological studies (IIIA 10)

Austrian national assessment for section 9 – Ecotoxicology – is in most parts covered by the detailed evaluations presented in the Core assessment, Part B, section 9.

This national assessment to the core assessment registration report therefore includes only parts of the national assessment which consider national assumptions and requirements and cause changes in comparison to the core assessment for the central zone. As the national assessment generally refers to the core assessment, the documents should be read in conjunction.

It is noted that currently no EU-harmonised approach and no method officially accepted by EFSA for the assessment of indirect effects on biodiversity (including trophic interactions) is available. Hence, for the time being the potential impact on biodiversity cannot be considered as mandatory part of the ecotoxicological risk assessment. As a consequence, based on the present risk assessment, negative effects on biodiversity (including trophic interactions) cannot be ruled out. [delete if not applicable, e.g. greenhouse/indoor use]

The GAP provided by the applicant for the core assessment evaluation covers the presented GAP relevant for the Austrian national assessment.

Effects on birds (KCP 10.1.1)

Effects on terrestrial vertebrates other than birds (KCP 10.1.2)

Effects on other terrestrial vertebrate wildlife (reptiles and amphibians) (KCP 10.1.3)

Effects on aquatic organisms (KCP 10.2)

Effects on bees (KCP 10.3.1)

Effects on arthropods other than bees (KCP 10.3.2)

Effects on non-target soil meso- and macrofauna (KCP 10.4)

Effects on soil microbial activity (KCP 10.5)

Effects on non-target terrestrial plants (KCP 10.6)

Classification and Labelling

Implications for labelling resulting from ecotoxicological assessment:

Classification under Regulation (EC) 1272/2008
Category:	…
Pictogram:	…
Signal word:	…
Hazard statement:	…
Precautionary statement:	…
Justification of the classification proposal:
…

Lists of data considered in support of the evaluation

List of data submitted by the applicant in support of the evaluation in AT and relied on

Data point	Author(s)	Year	Title Company Report No. Source (where different from company) GLP or GEP status Published or not	Vertebrate study Y/N	Owner
No specific studies relevant for national assessment were submitted. (Delete if not applicable)
KCP XX	Author	YYYY	Title Company Report No Source GLP/non GLP/GEP/non GEP Published/Unpublished	Y/N	Owner

GAP’s applied for in AT